On this page
- The automation-vs-campaign gap (the headline finding)
- Per-flow benchmarks
- Omnisend automation benchmarks by type (as-of 2026-05-12)
- Klaviyo flow benchmarks (143K flows, 2023 sends)
- Flow design as practitioners' sources describe it
- Segmentation & personalisation
- Deliverability
- Platform landscape
- Contradictions
- Key terms
- Gaps / caveats
Email Marketing Automation
Email Marketing Automation
Triggered, event-driven email sequences ("flows") that fire automatically in response to shopper behaviour — welcome series, abandoned cart, browse abandonment, post-purchase, and win-back — as distinct from one-off broadcast "campaigns". In ecommerce it is the owned-channel retention engine that sits alongside Personalisation and SMS, and the recovery layer behind Checkout Abandonment and Email-First Checkout. The defining reported feature of the category is that a tiny share of total email volume drives a disproportionate share of email revenue.
The automation-vs-campaign gap (the headline finding)
The central, mutually-corroborated finding across the two major ESP benchmark reports is that automated flows vastly out-earn broadcast campaigns on a per-email basis.
- Omnisend's 2025 dataset (20B+ campaign emails plus 470M automated sends across 27,000+ brands) reports automated emails generated $3.41 per email sent vs $0.155 for campaigns — a 22× difference, and automations converted at 1.49% vs 0.08% for campaigns (~19× higher) (Omnisend, as-of 2026-05-12).
- Omnisend reports that automations were ~2% of total email volume but drove 37% of all email-driven sales, with abandoned cart, welcome, and browse abandonment together driving 87% of all automated orders (Omnisend, as-of 2026-05-12; the 2%/37%/87% figures surfaced via the report's search summary — med confidence).
- Klaviyo's 2025 benchmark (via third-party relay) reports flows generate ~41% of total email revenue from just 5.3% of sends, with revenue-per-recipient ~18× higher than campaigns (Klaviyo, as-of 2025 — med confidence, relayed via search snippet, original page not fetched).
Per-flow benchmarks
Omnisend automation benchmarks by type (as-of 2026-05-12)
| Automation type | Open rate | CTR | Conversion | Revenue/email | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back-in-stock | 58.80% | 21.31% | 6.72% | $9.14 | Highest RPR; used by only 0.6% of brands |
| Shipping confirmation | 62.67% | — | — | $3.08 | Highest open rate of any type |
| Order confirmation | 57.91% | — | — | $2.88 | — |
| Welcome | 35.53% | 3.94% | 2.11% | $6.16 | — |
| Abandoned cart | 37.12% | 4.13% | 1.72% | $3.59 | Most-used high-value automation (22.5% of brands) |
| Win-back (reactivation) | 33.11% | — | 0.54% | $0.51 | Lowest RPR |
Source: Omnisend 2025 dataset, as-of 2026-05-12. Omnisend overall campaign averages (2025): 30.41% open, 0.74% CTR, 0.08% conversion, 98.4% deliverability — caveated that Apple Mail Privacy Protection has inflated open rates since 2021.
Klaviyo flow benchmarks (143K flows, 2023 sends)
send data**. Included because it is the deepest single-flow dataset found and Klaviyo's newest full cross-flow table was only available second-hand this run.
Klaviyo reports abandoned cart flows drive the highest average revenue-per-recipient (RPR) and the highest conversion of all flows (Klaviyo, 2023 data, published 2024-05-15):
| Flow | Avg RPR | Top-10% RPR |
|---|---|---|
| All flows | $1.94 | $16.96 |
| Welcome | $2.65 | $21.18 |
| Abandoned cart | $3.65 | $28.89 |
| Browse abandonment | $1.07 | $7.21 |
| Post-purchase | $0.41 | $5.14 |
Klaviyo abandoned-cart engagement (2023): 50.5% open, 6.25% click, 3.33% conversion, 0.60% unsub; top-10% reach 65.34% open / 13.33% click / 7.69% conversion. Automotive and hardware/home-improvement saw ~$10 average abandoned-cart RPR; top-10% hardware brands hit $75.66 (Klaviyo, 2023 data).
Flow design as practitioners' sources describe it
Klaviyo describes a common abandoned-cart sequence as 3 emails — reminder at 2–4h, a follow-up at 24h (optionally with a discount), and a final at 48h with alternate-product recommendations or a feedback prompt — and warns that discounts can "train shoppers to wait", suggesting high-value carts be segmented for incentives rather than discounting universally (Klaviyo, published 2024-05-15). Omnisend reports automations carry higher unsubscribe rates (0.59%) than campaigns (0.20%), with cross-sell (0.89%) and welcome (0.87%) the highest-churn types, attributed to early-relationship timing (Omnisend, as-of 2026-05-12).
Segmentation & personalisation
Third-party sources citing Klaviyo report that segmented campaigns deliver 3× higher earnings per recipient, 1.63× higher open rates and 2.16× higher click rates than non-segmented, and that segmented emails generate "760% more revenue" (relayed via ReferralCandy / TopGrowth citing Klaviyo, as-of 2026 — low confidence, original Klaviyo report not fetched). The same relays attribute an 18–45% RPR lift to AI-driven predictive segments vs demographic segmentation (Klaviyo "2025 State of Email" via third-party — low confidence, uncorroborated). Vendor-reported case studies (conflict of interest) include Huda Beauty doubling YoY Klaviyo-attributed revenue via category-specific post-purchase flows and New West KnifeWorks citing 31% YoY conversion growth from RFM segments (Klaviyo case studies, dates unknown — low confidence). These connect to Customer Data Platform (CDP), Zero-Party Data and Recommendation Engine.
Deliverability
Litmus reports Gmail and Yahoo's bulk-sender rules took effect February 2024: senders of
5,000 daily emails to Gmail/Yahoo must authenticate via SPF, DKIM and DMARC, offer one-click unsubscribe honoured within 2 days, and keep the spam complaint rate under 0.3% (Google recommends staying near 0.1%) (Litmus, published 2025-04-04, rules effective 2024-02). Litmus also notes Google began deleting personal accounts inactive >2 years (from Dec 2023), raising bounce risk, and that a bounce rate above 2% damages sender reputation (Litmus, 2025-04-04).
Platform landscape
Third-party comparison sources (all with commercial bias) position the market as: Klaviyo as the default for B2C/D2C ecommerce (deepest native Shopify integration, product-level personalisation); Omnisend for SMB/budget multichannel; Braze for enterprise/app engagement (named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Multichannel Marketing Hubs); Mailchimp as more general-purpose/SMB; and Salesforce Marketing Cloud/Pardot skewing B2B (DigitalApplied / Maestra / Hesper, 2025–2026 — med confidence, multiple biased sources agree). Omnisend (a direct competitor — flag bias) reports Klaviyo changed pricing in February 2025 to bill against active profile counts, drawing "paying for inactive profiles" criticism (Omnisend, as-of 2025 — low-med confidence, competitor source, corroborate before relying). Entity pages Klaviyo, Omnisend, Braze and Mailchimp are dangling frontier links.
Contradictions
Abandoned-cart open rate. Klaviyo reports ~50.5% average open [1] vs Omnisend's 37.12% [2]. Likely driven by different platform user bases, methodology and time period (and Apple MPP inflation) rather than a true conflict — but the ~13-point gap is large. Note the abandoned-cart RPR figures are nearly identical (Klaviyo $3.65 vs Omnisend $3.59), mutually corroborating.
Welcome-flow RPR. Klaviyo $2.65 (2023 data) vs Omnisend $6.16 (2025 data) — a >2× divergence across different cohorts and methodologies; neither is adjudicated.
Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Flow / automation | Triggered, event-driven email sequence (vs one-off campaign) |
| Campaign | A single broadcast email blast to a list/segment |
| RPR | Revenue per recipient — revenue ÷ emails sent |
| Abandoned cart | Flow triggered when a shopper adds to cart but doesn't purchase |
| Browse abandonment | Flow triggered on product view without add-to-cart |
| Win-back / reactivation | Flow targeting lapsed customers |
| MPP | Apple Mail Privacy Protection — inflates open rates since 2021 |
Gaps / caveats
All quantitative flow benchmarks this run are vendor-published (Klaviyo, Omnisend) — inherent conflict of interest; no neutral analyst, academic, or Baymard quantification of flow RPR was fetched. Email+SMS cross-channel lift, AI in email automation (subject-line generation, send-time optimisation, predictive segments), and neutral inbox-placement deliverability benchmarks (Litmus/Validity 2026 report referenced but not fetched) remain unfilled. Reddit and YouTube practitioner layers are absent — both source MCPs were unavailable this run (not a rate-limit skip).
References
- 2023 data — www.klaviyo.com/blog/abandoned-cart-benchmarks
- 2025 data — www.omnisend.com/blog/email-marketing-benchmarks