On this page
- How it works
- Primary use case: batch-to-sort
- Put-to-Light vs. Put Wall — not interchangeable
- Performance benchmarks
- Throughput by directing technology
- Vendor landscape
- Notable vendor developments (2025–2026)
- Case study: cabi (fashion retailer) — 2026
- Market size
- Fashion/apparel relevance
- Key terms
- Gaps in current coverage
Put-to-Light
Put-to-Light
Put-to-light (PTL) is a light-directed warehouse technology that guides operators where to place an item after it has been retrieved — the functional inverse of pick-to-light, which guides operators where to take from. It is the automation layer that resolves the sortation step in a Batch Picking workflow: a picker collects items for many orders in a single warehouse pass, and put-to-light then directs them to place each item into the correct order bin or cubby without paper or memorisation.
How it works
The operator workflow is as follows: the operator scans an item barcode; the light module at the correct destination bin illuminates (typically showing the quantity to place and using colour to indicate placement type); the operator places the item; they press a confirmation button or break a sensor; the system sends a real-time confirmation event back to the Warehouse Management System (WMS) or Warehouse Execution System (WES); the operator scans the next item. (AutoStore, dclcorp.com — undated evergreen page, fetched 2026-07-05)
Put-to-light systems integrate with WMS and ERP via bidirectional REST API: the WMS sends light-on commands specifying location, quantity, and colour; the device sends confirmation events back in real time. (Voodoo Robotics, voodoorobotics.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
Coloured lights distinguish different placement instructions, reducing cognitive load and operator search time. (AutoStore, autostoresystem.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
Primary use case: batch-to-sort
The dominant application in ecommerce fulfilment is the batch-to-sort (or zone-batch) workflow:
- Pickers collect multiple orders simultaneously by SKU in a single warehouse pass — Batch Picking
- At the put wall or sortation station, put-to-light directs each item into the correct order bin or cubby
- A second team on the other side of the Put Wall packs completed orders
"One of the most popular applications for put-to-light systems is sorting of batch picked products into individual orders." (DCL Logistics, dclcorp.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
Sellercloud describes a related pattern: zone batch picking, where a warehouse is divided into zones, pickers batch within their zone, and put-to-light performs the cross-zone sortation. (Sellercloud, sellercloud.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
Put-to-Light vs. Put Wall — not interchangeable
A common source of confusion in vendor pitches: put-to-light is the light-guided software system (hardware modules + controller + WMS integration); a Put Wall is the physical shelving structure (cubbies, slots) in which PTL light modules are typically embedded. Choosing between them — or combining them — should start from identifying where errors and delays arise in a specific operation, not from the technology. (Electrotec SC, electrotecsc.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
Performance benchmarks
[!unverified] All accuracy and throughput figures below are vendor-cited. No independent, peer-reviewed study (e.g. Fraunhofer, MHI, WERC) was surfaced in 2024–2026 searches. Treat as directional.
- Order accuracy: PTL systems consistently deliver ≥99.9% order accuracy vs 96–98% for manual paper-based picking. (as-of undated; AutoStore, autostoresystem.com — fetched 2026-07-05)
- Throughput: 300–500 lines per operator per hour in general environments; rising to 400–600 with horizontal carousels or VLMs in pharmaceutical/electronics settings. (as-of undated; Numina Group, numinagroup.com — fetched 2026-07-05)
- Improvement vs baseline: 30–50% throughput improvement over paper-based or RF-scanner picking in high-velocity repetitive environments. (as-of undated; AutoStore, autostoresystem.com — fetched 2026-07-05)
Throughput upper bound: Numina Group cites 300–500 lines/operator/hour [numinagroup.com]. A search summary (source unclear) cited "up to 1,000 lines/hour per operator." The upper figure likely applies only to carousel-integrated or Goods-to-Person (GTP)-adjacent configurations, not standalone PTL in a conventional DC. The lower figure is the more conservative and better-attributed estimate.
- Training time: 30–45 minutes to train an operator on a well-configured PTL system. (as-of 2025-03-27; Aliter Business Services, youtube.com/watch?v=Eac8Za0hjyE — fetched 2026-07-05)
- Sorting speed: An automated put wall with PTL allows a single operator to sort up to 3× faster than manual sorting. (as-of undated; unknown channel, youtube.com/watch?v=QZvq-FjGwJE — low confidence; unattributed benchmark)
Throughput by directing technology
Honeywell Intelligrated identifies three directing technologies for put-wall operation, ranked by throughput: RF handheld (lowest) → voice-directed (mid) → put-to-light (highest). (as-of 2021-11-04; Honeywell Intelligrated, youtube.com/watch?v=CbvIcWNIRak — fetched 2026-07-05)
Vendor landscape
The put-to-light / pick-to-light market's major vendors include: Daifuku, SSI Schäfer, Dematic, Honeywell Intelligrated, KNAPP, Kardex Group, Vanderlande, Lightning Pick Technologies (Matthews Automation), Swisslog, Murata Machinery, Bastian Solutions, Falcon Autotech. Top-10 players hold more than 50% of the warehouse automation market. (as-of 2021-08-11; BusinessWire/ResearchAndMarkets — stale-risk applies)
Notable vendor developments (2025–2026)
- Dematic broke ground in January 2026 on a USD 150M expansion of its Grand Rapids, Michigan plant — 200,000 sq ft of new capacity for Automated Storage and Retrieval System (AS/RS) and PTL systems, creating 300 jobs and cutting North American lead times by ~⅓. (as-of 2026-01; Spherical Insights secondary source, fetched 2026-07-05 — original Dematic press release not fetched)
- Honeywell Intelligrated Momentum WES: just-in-time cubby allocation assigns orders to the first available put wall cubby, even across multiple put walls, to prevent idle locations and maintain throughput. (Honeywell Intelligrated, youtube.com/watch?v=CbvIcWNIRak — 2021; product page confirms active product line)
- Lightning Pick (Matthews Automation): integrates with auto baggers, WMS, WES, WCS platforms; 1,000+ installations worldwide in retail, ecommerce, 3PL, pharmaceutical, grocery, cosmetics. (as-of 2020; Lightning Pick — stale-risk)
- Falcon Autotech: PTL system designed specifically for fashion retail and 3PL store-order fulfilment scenarios with high SKU counts and partial-carton processing requirements. (Falcon Autotech, falconautotech.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
- Dematic Next Generation series: fully customisable PTL, scalable, integrates into most existing WMS and ERP processes. (Dematic, dematic.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
Case study: cabi (fashion retailer) — 2026
Fashion brand cabi relocated its distribution centre from California to Indianapolis in 2024–2025 and implemented a put wall system. The new facility separates operations into three distinct stages: (1) batch picking by SKU, (2) sorting at the put wall using put-to-light into cubbies (one cubby per order), (3) packing by a second team on the wall's other side.
The put wall system was designed and built by integrator Systems in Motion, which also integrated a Warehouse Execution System (WES) running its KOZ automation software and added a conveyor from pack stations to delivery docks. The full project — from market assessment through relocation and facility opening — was completed in 12 months. (DC Velocity, dcvelocity.com — published 2026-01-18; Alpine Supply Chain Solutions, alpinesupplychain.com — undated)
[!unverified] Quantitative productivity improvements (30% delivery improvement / 40% transit time / 50% pick line productivity) appeared in a search engine snippet from the DC Velocity article. These figures could not be independently confirmed as the full article may be behind a paywall. Filed as unverified until confirmed.
Market size
Three market research firms give different 2025 baseline figures for the pick-to-light market (which encompasses put-to-light):
- Research and Markets: USD 658.7M in 2025 → USD 916.9M by 2030 (CAGR 6.84%) [GlobeNewswire, 2025-09-24]
- Mordor Intelligence: USD 620M in 2025 → USD 1,010M by 2030 (CAGR 10.28%) [mordorintelligence.com — undated]
- Future Market Insights: USD 775.6M in 2025 → USD 1,068.9M by 2030, USD 1,483.5M by 2035 [futuremarketinsights.com — undated]
The divergence likely reflects different scope definitions (e.g. pure PTL hardware vs broader light-directed picking including put walls and RFID-light hybrids). All figures should be treated as directional only; no firm's methodology is publicly peer-reviewed. (as-of 2025)
Drivers cited for market growth: e-commerce expansion, warehouse automation adoption, retail sector demand. Expanding addressable markets: cold storage and food industry (GlobeNewswire, 2024-08-23). Trend signals for 2025–2026: AI integration, enhanced sortation, greater flexibility for diverse product types (Future Market Insights, futuremarketinsights.com — undated; low confidence — market report summary language only).
Fashion/apparel relevance
Fashion and apparel retail is identified as a high-ROI vertical for PTL because high SKU counts and size/colour variants create maximum mis-pick risk in manual workflows. Falcon Autotech specifically designed its PTL offering for fashion retail store-order fulfilment (partial quantities from inbound cartons of multiple SKUs). (Falcon Autotech, falconautotech.com — undated, fetched 2026-07-05)
AutoStore notes that integration of AutoStore GTP + PTL + Swisslog SynQ WMS can process over 25,000 daily orders. (as-of undated; AutoStore — vendor claim, no named client; low confidence)
Key terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| PTL | Put-to-Light — the light-directed system |
| Pick-to-Light (PTL/P2L) | Light system guiding operators to retrieve items (inverse of put-to-light) |
| Put Wall | Physical shelving structure with cubbies in which PTL modules are typically embedded — see Put Wall |
| Batch-to-sort | Workflow: batch pick by SKU across many orders, then sort to individual order bins at a put wall |
| Zone controller | Hardware unit controlling light modules in a defined sortation zone; single point of failure if not backed up |
| WES | Warehouse Execution System (WES) — layer between WMS and hardware that orchestrates real-time PTL commands |
| Cubby | Individual compartment in a put wall assigned to one order |
| Light module | Illuminated display unit mounted at each cubby/put location; shows quantity, colour, and confirmation button |
| JIT allocation | Just-in-time cubby allocation (Honeywell Momentum) — assigns orders to first available cubby dynamically rather than pre-assigning at run start |
Gaps in current coverage
- No independent benchmarks (Fraunhofer / MHI / WERC) for accuracy or throughput — all figures are vendor-sourced
- No ROI / payback period data with named sources (2024–2026)
- No European-specific adoption data, vendor market share in EU, or regulatory/labour-cost context
- No head-to-head comparison of PTL-at-a-put-wall vs Goods-to-Person (GTP) for the same operation type
- No pricing or TCO data (vendors do not publish)
- Reddit signal: unavailable — reddit-research MCP produced no real data in this run (tool calls: 0); gap logged
- Omnichannel use cases (store replenishment + ecommerce from the same zone) not covered
- BOPIS / click-and-collect PTL use cases not covered